ChatGPT makes history—it saves Google by radically transforming the perception of the search market in the antitrust trial against the company
Who would have thought that ChatGPT—the same AI often seen as Google’s biggest threat—would end up saving the tech giant in court? Yet, that’s exactly what happened in the United States v. Google antitrust trial, one of the most important legal battles in technology history.
The outcome shocked analysts worldwide. While the court confirmed that Google holds a monopoly in the search engine market, the punishment was far lighter than experts predicted. Why? Because AI, especially ChatGPT, transformed the way judges viewed the future of search.
Judge Amit Metha referenced artificial intelligence 133 times in his ruling, highlighting that generative AI has already begun reshaping the way people search, retrieve, and interact with information.

What is ChatGPT and Why Does It Matter in the Google Antitrust Trial?
ChatGPT, developed by OpenAI, is a generative AI system that produces direct, human-like answers instead of simply listing links to websites like traditional search engines.
Unlike Google Search, which relies on its advertising-driven model and web index, ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity AI, and Google’s own Gemini offer a conversational search experience. Users ask questions, and instead of clicking through multiple pages, they get personalized, synthesized answers instantly.
This evolution has disrupted the search market and forced regulators to acknowledge that search engines no longer operate in the same way they did a decade ago.

AI as Google’s Unexpected Savior
Ironically, the same technology threatening Google’s search dominance ended up protecting the company in court.
Judge Metha acknowledged that the rise of AI-powered search engines means that Google’s monopoly faces new forms of competition. Instead of punishing Google with extreme measures—like forcing the sale of Google Chrome or banning exclusive contracts—the court concluded that AI is already reshaping the industry and reducing barriers for competitors.
This perspective made Google’s dominance appear less absolute, giving the company a lifeline.
What the Court Decided
In his ruling, Judge Metha stopped short of imposing draconian penalties. Instead, he ordered:
- Google must share certain search data with competitors to foster fairer competition.
- Exclusive contracts with partners like Apple must be limited, reducing Google’s ability to lock in default search deals.
This means Google keeps its empire intact, but regulators will be watching closely to see how AI continues shifting market power.

Reactions: Praise and Criticism
Not everyone was happy with the outcome.
- Gabriel Weinberg, CEO of DuckDuckGo, argued that Google’s dominant position still stifles competition, even with AI in play.
- Tim Sweeney, CEO of Epic Games, was harsher, comparing the ruling to letting a bank robber off with probation—“he keeps the loot but shares his robbery methods with others.”
These criticisms highlight a deep skepticism: Can AI really level the playing field, or will Google still find ways to dominate AI search just as it did with traditional search?
The Bigger Picture: The Future of Search Engines
The case shows that AI has permanently changed the definition of a search engine. Instead of a page full of blue links, users now engage with AI Overviews, conversational search, and direct answers.
- Google Gemini, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, and Perplexity AI are in a battle for the future of information discovery.
- Advertisers, publishers, and users must adapt to this new reality, where AI may reduce web traffic to traditional websites but increase instant knowledge delivery.
- The ruling essentially says: AI has already disrupted Google’s monopoly, so regulators won’t dismantle it—for now.
Final Thoughts
The United States v. Google trial will go down in history as the case where AI, led by ChatGPT, shifted the narrative. Instead of crushing Google, the court acknowledged that generative AI is the new frontier of competition.
Ironically, Google’s biggest threat became its biggest defense. By proving that the search market is no longer static but rapidly evolving due to AI, ChatGPT may have saved Google from its harshest penalty yet.